May 27, 2010
"Facebook’s Vision: “The world would be a better place if people would share more in public.” Exposure > Privacy"

@SocialMedia411

It‘s my vision
A total one
Encompassing
The only one
A world complete
That‘s all my own
Exactly as
As it should be, oh

I lost myself
I lost myself
You can‘t see how
Because I am just a cloud…a cloud.

Everything adds up to a truth
Maybe now, I can know me too
I have you now
Where you should be
You are mine now
But I lost me, I‘m a cloud

###

May 14, 2010
Clique - privacy enhanced Social Network Site

“Feature list:

  • collections – contacts are organised in collections, roughly corresponding with social circles. USers can form instance define close friends, family, colleagues, former schoolfriends etc as their collections.
  • flexible access control to content – all content contains AC policies based on moving collections and individuals contacts in or out of access, no access boxes
  • visual audience indicators – all content is labeled by icons showing who has access to the information
  • fading relations – depending on the activity of one’s contacts, these users slowly disappear. At first this happens through visual indicators (coloured border around user icon), later by closing access to one’s data from the automatically defriended contact.

[…] Future Plans […]

  1. Building pseudonym functionality for participation in groups in Clique:
    1. When the audience of a self-presentation is unknown or unknowable (as is the case when users participate in groups) it is in the users’ interest to create distance between their ‘real’ identities and their persona displayed in the group. In everyday life this practice is known as masking — think, for instance, of using a pen name to write a book, of stage names for pop idols and of code names for secret agents.
    2. Mimicking the everyday practice of masking we want to build a pseudonym tool for Clique, so that whenever users want to join or create a group they are asked to provide a pseudonym to use for all their postings.
    3. This pseudonym should be invisibly linked to the face(s) behind it, so that the user’s privacy is guaranteed.
  2. Building a fading and blossoming relationships tool in Clique:
    1. In real life relationships between people tend to wax and wane rather than remain exactly the same over time. When people do not see or speak to each other for long periods of time relationships may fade away entirely.
    2. In social network sites all relationships are stable and there is no (visible) difference between contacts that one engages with frequently and ones one doesn’t engage with at all anymore after the moment of adding them to the contact list. We want to remedy this fact by building a tool that mimics fading relationship in Clique, by allowing these to gradually disappear from the contact list. Similarly, blossoming relationships could be made visually more prominent and given more easy access to content and information.
  3. Building a fading content tool for Clique:
    1. One of the key problems with respect to privacy on the internet of the level of permanence of much of the information people place online. Content lives on in cyberspace, oftentimes even long after the owner has forgotten about it, or, even worse, has attempted to remove it.
    2. To contribute to solving this issue we would like to build a fading content tool, which works in a similar way as the one mentioned under 3, except for content.
  4. Integration with and gaining feedback from the Open Source community, so we can return Clique into that community.”

May 13, 2010
See also: Privacy as a Political Right

See also: Privacy as a Political Right

February 28, 2010
The De-Anonymization of the Internet Begins In Earnest

guerrillamamamedicine:

amandaw:

Ann Bartow:

From this article entitled “Start-Up Links 65 Million IP Addresses To Users, Readies Targeting Platform”:

… [T]he company ClearSight Interactive is getting ready to launch a form of targeting based on users’ IP addresses. ClearSight, which describes IP addresses as the bridge between users’ offline and online data, has spent the last 18 months acquiring more than 100 million IP addresses — along with email addresses and postal addresses — from publishers. As of today, ClearSight Interactive believes it has collected enough data from publishers to reliably link 65 million “sticky” IP addresses — typically for people who connect to the Web using cable modems — to specific individuals, ClearSight president Tim Daly told MediaPost today during a break at the OMMA Behavioral conference. …

People’s surfing can be tracked by exploiting a browser loophole basically which lets anybody see where else a site’s visitors have been on the Internet, see e.g. two “online target marketing services” Beencounter, and Haveyourfriendsbeenthere.

Hackers can figure out who we are. And of course Google has entered into some sort of agreement with the federal government. Soon simply a typing cadence may identify the person typing.

For those who kick it old school, at least one survey of subpoenas against anonymous Internet speakers is underway.

January 8, 2010

Anonymous asked: how old are you?

That, I would never answer anyone called anonymous :) but @autobees thinks I’m 70 so I’ll go with that. Sorry, I’m starting to realize this probably won’t be fun for anyone, seeing as how I’m pretty much a privacy nut… #ohwellnevermind here’s a page with funny pictures (: