July 23, 2010
5 Confusing Biblical Rules (and What They May Mean)

3. THE RULE: “…thou shalt not sow thy field with mingled seed; neither shall a garment of mingled linen and woolen come upon thee.” (Leviticus 19:19)

THE TRANSLATION: Don’t wear clothes made of mixed fibers. Wool-and-linen blends are particularly bad. Polycotton is probably OK.

POSSIBLE EXPLANATION: The Old Testament was obsessed with separating things. (Don’t wear mixed fibers; don’t mix milk and meat.) According to many biblical scholars, the idea was to drill the notion of separation into the ancient Israelite mind. This way, they would remain separate from the pagans and not intermarry-a sin even worse than mixing wool and linen.”

June 6, 2010
HANSI
THE GIRL WHO LOVED THE SWASTIKA

HANSI

THE GIRL WHO LOVED THE SWASTIKA

May 22, 2010
Puppets, Pageantry and Protest Politics: White People and the Anti-War Movement

via clingtomymouth

May 18, 2010
I don’t find this funny or clever at all. A hodge-podge of perspectives lumped under one self-righteous, third-worldist banner that I’m really getting tired of, especially after following the overblown outcry on the Egyptian twitterverse over @jmayton’s light-hearted (in bad taste? ill-advised? you be the judge) jab at Egypt’s dietary habits. [note: I have never read any of his articles & therefore don’t know if his critics already have gripes with him, but that’s besides the point.]
I think there’s a real danger that leaving this kind of lazy identitarianism unchecked would leave our very just causes defenseless, shored up only with absolute tripe [whenever you speak of a cause, you’re not actually fighting for it; you’re creating a discourse around it in which a fight is legitimated] when we elevate ourselves - based on what? Our brownness? - as some kind of sanctum sanctorum, not to be touched, not to be part of normal human relation. Cultural appropriation by profiteering sharks is one thing; holding white people to impossible standards simply because they are white, or because they are “foreign” is just embarassing. They can ‘find themselves’ in their ‘ethnic’ doodads all they want, as long as it means I too can find myself in balkan beat, or celtic punk or viking metal. The crimes of orientalists do not give us a free pass to be assholes.
Don’t be marginal.

source

I don’t find this funny or clever at all. A hodge-podge of perspectives lumped under one self-righteous, third-worldist banner that I’m really getting tired of, especially after following the overblown outcry on the Egyptian twitterverse over @jmayton’s light-hearted (in bad taste? ill-advised? you be the judge) jab at Egypt’s dietary habits. [note: I have never read any of his articles & therefore don’t know if his critics already have gripes with him, but that’s besides the point.]

I think there’s a real danger that leaving this kind of lazy identitarianism unchecked would leave our very just causes defenseless, shored up only with absolute tripe [whenever you speak of a cause, you’re not actually fighting for it; you’re creating a discourse around it in which a fight is legitimated] when we elevate ourselves - based on what? Our brownness? - as some kind of sanctum sanctorum, not to be touched, not to be part of normal human relation. Cultural appropriation by profiteering sharks is one thing; holding white people to impossible standards simply because they are white, or because they are “foreign” is just embarassing. They can ‘find themselves’ in their ‘ethnic’ doodads all they want, as long as it means I too can find myself in balkan beat, or celtic punk or viking metal. The crimes of orientalists do not give us a free pass to be assholes.

Don’t be marginal.

source

May 9, 2010
"Not being racist is not some default starting position. You don’t simply get to say you’re not a racist; not being racist — or a sexist or a homophobe — is a constant, arduous process of unlearning, of being uncomfortable, of eating crow and being humbled and re-evaluating. It’s probably hard to start that process if you’ve been told that every thought you have is golden and should be given voice, and that people who are offended by what you say are hypersensitive simpletons."

PostBourgie

/via katoleary + lavenderlines + notemily + amandaw + jadedhippy + guerrillamamamedicine

April 21, 2010
Is the progressive case for migration truly progressive? > openDemocracy

“There is in truth nothing progressive at all in a ‘laissez faire’ approach to migration which relies for its logic on an extreme neo-liberal position that people should fight ‘dog eat dog’ for economic opportunities wherever they can find them in an unregulated global economy. A new fairer world economic order is not going to be built on this approach. Neither is it persuasive to take the line that because developed, former imperialist powers like the UK have helped to create such an unjust world, mass migration would solve the problem. Research by ippr ‘Development on the move’ to be published in May, shows that migration has largely beneficial development impacts, but the report is quite clear that it does not amount to a development strategy. It is through the pursuit of trade justice, improved governance and economic redistribution that a fairer world will be achieved, not through huge disorganised movements of people.”

Strange to argue like a neoliberal (development, development, development!) using anti-neoliberal arguments… Having said that, it’s still interesting to read something that shuffles ideological cards, even if only for argument’s sake.

P.S. Question: is this “mass migration” an actual phenomenon? Are the huddled masses really swamping Europe? I have a feeling this straw man needs burning…

November 30, 2009
Blame it on the Tetons

just a collection of my tweets on the issue, with minor editing.

Strange discussions going on re Swiss ban of minarets. Why are all cards always mixed? Do we say things just to say them, or are we earnestly trying to communicate? If it’s the latter, then there is much failure in our midst. For Muslims tweeting about the theological (in)significance of minarets & domes: this discussion is important for your coreligionists - it should be part of the discussions in your community & marks an enlightened & progressive view of your belief-system, but - this is obviously not the discussion people are having when discussing the minarets in Switzerland.

The issue is about policing architecture on a racist & xenophobic basis, in a purportedly liberal society, in a global climate of increasing demonization of muslims-as-muslims - i.e. in their very person; the critiques of their belief-system is just an embellishment. Muslims as people are being targeted.

Let’s think about this for a second. People are being targeted as people. Substitute the word muslim with ‘jew’, ‘gay’, ‘emo’, ‘scottish’ - I can make that list more ridiculous if you want, but really, these labels are equal in the context of bigotry.

Now, as for hypocrisy - some are saying that muslims are being hypocritical when complaining about freedoms in Europe, when muslim countries aren’t tolerant etc. For those in muslim countries saying this, & for those in Europe, whether you’re muslim yourself or not - this is a different conversation. Civil liberties in all societies is an important issue, but forgive me for not seeing all muslims on planet earth as a single political bloc. To qualify the demand for protecting a purported liberal system from the ascendancy of the Right with the logic of ‘tit for tat’ is bull. It is also ahistorical. Much struggle is needed for many muslim countries (lets not forget cross-variance among these countries) to even purport liberalism. And this has nothing to with their being muslim. This same history happened everywhere, even *gasp* Europe (remember Luther & all that?).

see also: http://is.gd/57gLB via @DougSaunders

October 29, 2009
The internet is no meritocracy > Digital immigrant

via @evgenymorozov

October 23, 2009
#BNP #BBCqt > tweets of interest

@hannahnicklin My 2p: Putting the #BNPonBBC doesn’t legitimise them,1000s of people voting for them does.People are racist, we need to face this in public. +

@autobees First car crash point. Jack Straw should not be trying to compete with the BNP on who has the toughest immigration policy. Argh! #bbcqt +

@syrianews Warsi calls for limits on numbers of immigrants. Idiot. She is playing the BNP’s game. Idiot. +

@pickledpolitics Sayeeda Warsi and Jack Straw position on immigration is the same. She just said it better #BBCQT +

@syrianews They are trying to be better immigrant-bashers than the BNP. This is how low British politics has sunk. #bbcqt +

@pickledpolitics But the Conservative Party’s policy on immigration is the same as Labour’s. #BBCQT +

@pickledpolitics Chris Huhne sounding a bit hawkish on immigration… unusual for him. Suspect they’re all trying to outmaneuver Griffin #BBCQT +

@hannahnicklin #bbcqt I’m so bored with this fallacious anti-immigration rhetoric -a debate entirely cultivated by lazy right wing media +

@hannahnicklin And it hurts that Labour can’t acknowledge how bloody necessary immigration is to our ageing population, and groaning public sector #bbcqt +

@syrianews Griffin: we are the aborigines here (FACTUALLY BOLLOCKS) +

@LostLondon Is anyone going to tell them all idiots they would not be so many immigrants if they stopped messing other countries up?! #bbcqt +

@hannahnicklin OK, according to the internet, if a ‘proper Britain’ has to be as of 17000 years ago, we need to be Ukranian http://bit.ly/2Wp6j8 #bbcqt +

@autobees All of the parties are tripping over the topic of immigration to show they have the toughest policy & are pandering to BNP tactics. +

@autobees The most challenging questions on immigration came from patriotic British Black/Asian people. Interesting. +

@autobees One of the moments where the audience laughed & heckled the most: indigenous English are like Indigenous Red Indians & were there 1st. +

@jamiepotter RT @paulbradshaw: If you think #bbcqt somehow burst the BNP bubble remind yourself of these reactions http://bit.ly/3yMOMa +

@ninapower Never mind Griffin, the whole debate took place on racist terms. Fucking depressing. +

@kpunk99 RT @bat020 Warsi’s drivel demonstrates how the very presence of the BNP pulls political discourse sharply to the right #bbcqt +

@kpunk99 Of course the reverse is also true. Reason that the BNP has gained ground is how right wing the mainstream discourse on immigration is. +

@nextleft #bbcqt ‘cast conventional politicians in a largely favourable light which they have not enjoyed for many a month’ John Kampfner, guardian +

September 19, 2009

“Alongside the “English Defence League”, who were counter-protesting the “Al Quds Day” march, another group of counter-protesters were calling for greater democracy in Iran. These two groups were allied during the event.”

via A.W.A on fb w/ commentary: “Since the Palestinian cause has been milked by some less than savoury governments in the region, the people who are oppressed by said governments are likely to become increasingly anti-Palestinian.”

“Alongside the “English Defence League”, who were counter-protesting the “Al Quds Day” march, another group of counter-protesters were calling for greater democracy in Iran. These two groups were allied during the event.”

via A.W.A on fb w/ commentary: “Since the Palestinian cause has been milked by some less than savoury governments in the region, the people who are oppressed by said governments are likely to become increasingly anti-Palestinian.”

September 7, 2009
Even babies discriminate.

Post-racism can only happen through history, never in spite of it. Whether it’s the small-scale ‘history’ that is child development, or the wakened memory fully-cognizant of past wrongs and the very present privileges built upon them, justice is always deferred when history is denied. And while the Slave Master’s shame is all well and good, ‘post’-racial/colonial guilt is only one tiny, baby’s step towards dismantling the Plantation for good.

link via igather

September 7, 2009

via igather + dominickbrady + nevver + If Charlie Parker

“Yale cheerleaders Greg Parker and Bill Brown give the Black Power salute during the National Anthem starting the Yale-Dartmouth football game in the Yale Bowl, November 2nd. (1968)”

via igather + dominickbrady + nevver + If Charlie Parker

“Yale cheerleaders Greg Parker and Bill Brown give the Black Power salute during the National Anthem starting the Yale-Dartmouth football game in the Yale Bowl, November 2nd. (1968)”

September 1, 2009
How Do White Metal Fans Handle An N-Bomb Sing-Along?